Transferring the Business to Family Is the Most Hazardous Exit Path
In Exit Planning, the most important element of successful transfers is financial security for departing owners. This element often is gravely threatened by the prospect of transferring the business to successors (in this case, children) before the owners (i.e., parents) are financially secure.
Most Exit Planning Advisors have at some point watched in dismay as owners prematurely transfer business ownership to their children, who then prove incapable or unwilling to maintain the business’ success that their parents spent decades building. Parents are then forced to watch as their business, financial security, and family legacy burn, smolder, and die.
Parental Financial Security
Exit Paths that do not assure an owner’s financial security are not Exit Paths at all: They’re traps that can destroy an owner’s future. However, financial security has different meanings for different owners. Thus, we as Exit Planning Advisors must help owners determine what financial security means to them based on their unique situations.
Some owners are able to enjoy financial security independent of the business. Typically, this kind of financial security is the result of long-term investments of excess earnings outside of the business.
Other owners achieve financial security by leasing personal assets—such as equipment and office, warehouse, or manufacturing facilities—to the business for its use. Maintaining ownership of these personal assets and leasing them achieves the following:
- Provides ongoing, consistent income for the owner.
- Lowers the value of the business and reduces transfer (i.e., gift or estate) taxes, thereby easing the transfer of the business to business-active children.
- Makes assets (or wealth) available for transfer to non-business-active children.
- Protects assets from the business’ future creditors after the parent exits.
The difference between these two kinds of owners is that the first owner (i.e., financially secure independent of the business) most likely needs the business to continue generating rental income.
However, most owners achieve financial security through ongoing income directly from their businesses. These owners must not consider any kind of operational or ownership transfer—not even a transfer to family—before first assuring that they are financially secure.
When transferring ownership to family (specifically, to children), owners must consider the following two points:
- Owners must attain financial independence before they transfer ownership and control to their business-active children.
- Owners must consider gifting rather than selling ownership to their children in order to legally avoid paying more in taxes than is absolutely necessary. However, by gifting rather than selling controlling interest, owners will be entitled to nothing (or at least no cash) in return.
Jumping the Gun
As an Exit Planning Advisor, if an owner tells you that he or she is ready to transfer ownership to his or her children before attaining financial security, you must consider it a red flag. Business-owning parents often trust their children with the business without considering events that are outside of their children’s control. Failing to consider these events can cause harmful and irreversible damage to the business’ cash flow or cause a child to lose control of the business. Some examples of such outside events include a child’s poor business or personal decisions that lead to decreased business value or cash flow, a child’s premature death or, more likely, a child’s divorce. Unless your owner-clients consider these events when considering transferring the business to attain financial security, they may find themselves without a steady source of income.
To protect owners while reassuring their children that the business will transfer to them someday, BEI Exit Planning Advisors take the following actions:
- Amending owners’ Estate Plans to provide for a transfer of ownership to their children following the owners’ deaths.
- Creating an Exit Plan that maps out the process of ownership transfer from parent to child as the parent attains financial security. This plan design is based on designated financial benchmarks that the business must reach to trigger subsequent transfer steps, which is an approach BEI often uses in insider-transfer Exit Plans.
If the business-active children expect to receive ownership immediately, we recommend that the child obtain financing to pay for the parent-owner’s ownership interest, but only if the financing would guarantee the parent-owner’s financial security. However, this structure means that the family will be taxed twice on the transfer: once on the parent’s gain from the sale and once on the child’s income used to pay for the parent’s ownership interest. Additionally, banks will often refuse to lend money to successors without a large down payment (usually 20–40% of the total purchase price) or unless the successor owns a large stake (about 30–40%) in the business already (even then, it’s rare for banks to lend to these successors). This means that successors must receive significant ownership before acquiring the balance of the business via bank financing.
Finally, if the business fails to perform as required or the child leaves the business during the buyout period, owners must have the right to reacquire the ownership already transferred. This enables owners to transfer the business and obtain financial security via a sale to management or an outside party.
Regardless of whom your client sells to, financial security must be achieved. When transferring a business to family, the most common error is transferring too soon. Premature transfers in an Exit Planning context are unnecessary and dangerous. Thus, we recommend that you use the techniques described above to assure children-successors that they will one day own the business and assure that parent-owners will achieve financial security concurrently.
Advisors Will Be Extinct in 5 Years Unless…
I’ve had financial advisors for more than 40 years. Not once in those years have I called my advisor to find out what stock/funds I should buy or sell. But I have called to find out where I should get my first mortgage, when to sell my house, or how much income I could get in retirement.
In short -- and I think I’m pretty typical – I was looking for financial advice, as it relates to my life.
Here’s the disconnect, what most advisors do is simply manage their clients’ assets. They determine what to buy, and what to sell, they think about risk management, about growing their practice by finding new clients and about getting paid.
Historically that has been the business model. But as more women take control over financial assets, they, like me, will be looking for a different experience. And unless the financial community is willing to change ….. advisors, as they are today will be extinct in five years.
Advisors who want to survive will have to do a lot more than just manage money – they will have to provide genuine “advice”. That means doing what’s right for the client, not pushing product and pretending it’s advice.
Women especially, but all investors generally, are becoming more and more cynical. They says, “If I want advice about reducing my debt, that’s what I want and not ‘here’s more debt’ because that’s what my advisor gets paid for! And if saving taxes is what I want then saving taxes should take precedent over selling me a product.”
You may be thinking that spending your time providing advice isn’t lucrative but the reality is that in the long run – it pays off in spades. The advisors who take the time to build real relationships with clients, who provide advice as it relates to their clients’ lives, even when there is no immediate financial benefit to themselves, those who don’t simply push product – are the ones who over time have the most successful practices.
Generally women understand and value service, but they will say, “If I’m paying, I want to know what I’m paying for: Is it for returns? Is it for advice? Is it for administration? I want to know. Then I can make up my mind what’s worth it and what isn’t.”
Investing is becoming a commoditized business and technology is replacing research that no one else can find. Today the average advisor is hard pressed to consistently beat the markets, and with women emerging as the client of the future, unless they start providing real advice, their jobs will likely be extinct in five years.
- 1 of 1143