Compliance has a lot to answer for.
One of the truly negative consequences of evolving best practice advice standards is the trend to torture clients. Now torture is a rather harsh word, and I am sure that globally there is no particular agenda on the part of regulators or professional advisers or service providers to deliberately torture consumers.
Nevertheless, processes are imposed upon them for their own good by well-meaning folk who have forgotten (or never knew) what it is to work through a professional advice process themselves as consumers. So a process is created and the powers-that-be say “this won’t hurt – much“…and then wonder why the industry and consumer’ approach to utilising the financial advice process is treated with distinct trepidation?
Perhaps the areas where this torture occurs most frequently, and unnecessarily, are the aspect of the advice process focused upon uncovering the facts and dreams and ambitions and goals of clients, followed by the part where we have to evidence the worthiness of the recommendation solution or action.
The concept of determining what matters to the customer, and ensuring that you have all the appropriate information to be able to provide good objective and sound advice is totally valid. It is a necessity if good advice is to be provided that can actually be valuable to a customer, and be valued by them.
The problem is how the industry approaches the task.
An adviser and potential client are happily discussing the way ahead, and the client consents to engaging in the advice process. Out comes the 10-20 page discovery document…with oodles of boxes to be filled in…many of them with dollar signs just aching to have a number attached to them….and lots more boxes requiring precise data covering pretty much everything from knowing the zodiac signs of all offspring, current or potential, through to the complete medical history of your grandmother whose full name a consumer cannot accurately recall
Guess what the client is thinking when they see this process coming at them?
Generally they don’t feel any better about it if we pull out a tablet or laptop and do it electronically instead….they can still see the boxes on the screen…they know what’s coming….
…and so begins the process of disengagement by the consumer.
So why do we torture them?
The problem is not the data-gathering process as such. Nor is the problem that we do actually require quite a lot of information to do the job well. The problem – the torture – is imposed by policymakers and those in charge of distribution or advice channels.
They design or insist upon processes that cover their arses.
The processes are not designed with the end user in mind, or even with the adviser in mind. They are designed by people who are neither usually.
Whilst I am an avid supporter of a good advice process, and thoroughly understanding the client’s situation, we need to find ways to make the process less intimidating and more engaging. From that perspective it is still difficult to beat the old fashioned blank sheet of paper.
You did read that right.…I love gadgets, technology, and cool apps as much as the next person…and fully agree that we need to get a lot of information to be able to do the job professionally and completely. But it is the adviser who should have the skill to question and determine relevance of information, and for the consumer to be able to take the fact-finding discussion in directions which are meaningful for them. So I suggest a blank piece of paper is the way to go.
You see, when you sit in front of a client with a blank sheet of paper you are subliminally suggesting a number of positive things to them:
1. this process is about them, not you.
2. there are no preconceived or preset paths to be taken.
3. you are entirely focused on them, and paying attention to what they are saying.
4. you know your stuff – you know what you need to do; you know what you have to get; you know where you are going with this process.
5. you are actually really listening to them.
If you want to break down the barriers in your business and get higher levels of engagement and participation by clients consider going old school for some parts of your process. A blank sheet of paper can still be compliant – if you have done your work properly and gathered the required information. It isn’t the tool that does the job, it is you. A tool is just a tool – an inanimate object that does nothing valuable until it is used properly by an artisan.
Remember that the ultimate sophistication is simplicity.
Some simple things have stood the test of time because they were the best ways of doing things. And the least painful ways….and torturing clients with painful processes is no way to increase either confidence or participation in the use of financial advice.
Why Secure Passwords Matter and How to Create Them
10 Ways to Celebrate International Women’s Day
Becoming a Great Podcast Host with Celeste Headlee
New Guiding Principles for Opportunity Zone Investors
Leaders: Do You Challenge Your Status Quo?
9 Marketing Trends That Will Dominate This Year
How To Keep Envy From Destroying Your Workplace
6 Tips to Help Your Journey to Retirement
Who Do You Sell to First
Business Owners Should Set 3 Types of Exit Goals
Forward-Looking Investing14 hours ago
Moat Investing: Powered by Morningstar
Market Strategist14 hours ago
We Are Not Convinced the Market Storm Has Completely Passed
Development14 hours ago
Advisors: How To Answer “What Do You Do?”
Markets1 day ago
Higher Mortgage Rates, Student Loans and Nike
Equities2 days ago
7 Stocks That Pay the Largest Dividends of All That Trade on Nasdaq – Or Do They?
Advisor2 days ago
The Wizards of Wall Street vs. The Selbees from Michigan
Markets3 days ago
The Chameleons Are on the Run
Compliance3 days ago
Regulators Focusing on How Firms Identify, Monitor and Test Custody Scenarios With Client Assets