Written by: Yazann Romahi, Chief Investment Officer of Quantitative Beta Strategies and Lead Portfolio Manager of JPMorgan Diversified Return International Equity ETF at J.P. Morgan Asset Management
The hedge fund landscape is changing. Recent research has made it clear that a significant component of the returns from the main hedge fund styles are generated not only by fund managers’ skill, but as compensation for taking on some form of risks itself, or “beta.” The process is analogous to that of equity index fund investing, but instead of a large universe of stocks, investors hold a large universe of merger deals. The discovery is increasingly making it possible to attain hedge-fund-like returns, and diversification, through liquid, low-cost funds.
Merger arbitrage, a well-established hedge fund style, illustrates this possibility.
Traditionally, an active merger arbitrage manager will invest in a company being acquired, post the announcement of the merger but before the merger actually takes place while shorting the offering company. The premise is to capture the premium between the offer price and the prevailing price of the target stock. If the deal completes, the investor realizes a small return; if it fails, the investor faces potentially a large loss as the target stock drops back to the pre-offer price. The active manager would argue that skill is the key in determining the subset of deals to buy that are likeliest to complete.
Academic literature, on the other hand, finds that the risk premium exists explicitly to compensate investors for the risk of deal failure.1 Another way to look at this: the risk premium is as a form of insurance premium. The merger arb fund offers liquidity to shareholders who want to sell to realize the gains they have already made and protect themselves if the deal fails to close.
The literature argues that the return exists since the arbitrageur is taking on this negative skew risk. This risk can be reduced by diversifying across a large number of deals, significantly reducing the impact of any one deal failing to close. The “beta” of merger arbitrage evidently came from capturing the risk premium in the aggregate of all investable deals –just as equity beta is created by holding a large universe of stocks –and shorting appropriately so that the fund is purely invested in arbitrage and unaffected by the broad equity markets. We believe that merger arbitrage deals’ beta may explain a large portion of the return.
Capturing the premium isn’t straightforward for funds. They must short stock deals and rebalance portfolios as deals are announced and completed. The strategy exhibits some residual equity sensitivity, so funds can’t be entirely market-neutral—risk spreads widen in periods of market stress. Yet because the merger universe is relatively limited (typically, to 50 to 90 names at any one time), leaving little possible dispersion among different managers, returns to the average manger are driven—not surprisingly—by systematic exposure to a verifiable merger arbitrage beta.
In short, research makes it clear that cost-effective alternative beta funds are especially well-suited for gaining exposure to the merger arb strategy of hedge fund investing.
Learn more about Alternative Beta here.
1M. Mitchell and T. Pulvino, “Characteristics of risk and return in risk arbitrage,” The Journal of Finance, 56 (2001): 2135– 2175.
Opinions and statements of market trends that are based on current market conditions constitute our judgment and are subject to change without notice. These views described may not be suitable for all investors. References to specific securities, asset classes and financial markets are for illustrative purposes only and are not intended to be, and should not be interpreted as, recommendations. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Investment returns and principal value of an investment will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when sold or redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. ETF shares are bought and sold throughout the day on an exchange at market price (not NAV) through a brokerage account, and are not individually redeemed from the fund. Shares may only be sold or redeemed directly from a fund by Authorized Participants, in very large creation/redemption units. For all products, brokerage commissions will reduce returns.
The Best Way To Detect Lack Of Integrity In Others
The Fed’s Next Move May Be No Move at All
Why Would Goldman Sachs Be Interested in a Small Bike Shop in Mexico?
How to Transition a Business After a Partnership Break-Up
How to Change the Way Your Body and Brain Work
The Key to Reaching True Contentment
Uncovering Your Next Best Self
My Three Financial Guilty Pleasures
20 Steps to Take During Your Job Search
How to Choose the Right Influencers for Your Campaign
Markets6 hours ago
The Fed’s Next Move May Be No Move at All
Markets18 hours ago
Why The Next Recession Will Be Different
Equities19 hours ago
What You’re Not Hearing About the China Trade War
Development19 hours ago
The Best Practice Management Idea of the Year
Advisor1 day ago
Homer Simpson vs Mr. Burns
Insights2 days ago
Europe: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly
Markets2 days ago
The Mad March Bounce
Development2 days ago
Persevering Through Daily Mundane Is the Quickest Path to Success