Written by: David Lebovitz, Global Market Strategists, J.P. Morgan Asset Management
- The next bear market will likely be associated with a U.S. recession. While it is impossible to pinpoint exactly when this might occur, the risk of recession is growing as the expansion ages.
- Most likely, the next recession will be milder than the last, and the next bear market will be milder than the last two.
- Some believe that because of low prevailing interest rates on bonds and cheaper international equity valuations (relative to the U.S.), bonds should provide less protection and international equities should provide more protection in the face of falling U.S. equity markets. Research using data from the last 25 years suggests this may not be the case.
- However, relative valuations that suggest international stocks may be somewhat undervalued and high-quality bonds may be somewhat overvalued, indicates some opportunity in being overweight the former and underweight the latter in the period before any significant U.S. equity downturn begins.
Timing the next bear market
Every recession does not have to trigger a bear market, and every bear market does not have to be associated with a recession. As shown in Exhibit 1, since 1929, the U.S. has seen 10 bear markets and 14 recessions, with 8 of the bear markets associated with recessions. Moreover, the two bear markets that were not associated with recessions ended within six months. Therefore, although other triggers are possible, a recession is the most likely cause of a sustained bear market in U.S. stocks.
In July, the U.S. economy entered the tenth year of the current economic expansion, and given that it is now the second longest in U.S. history, many are asking how much longer it can last.
Statistically, this is a very difficult question to answer. Based on historical analysis over the last few decades, the chances of entering recession in any given quarter is less than 5%. This means that over a year, the probability is less than 20%, and over three years, the risk is generally less than 60%. And this is, for the most part, the right way to look at it. However, there is good reason to believe that the economy is generally more vulnerable to recession late in a cycle and when it has low unemployment.
This is because later in a cycle, there is a lack of pent-up demand, greater difficulty in finding workers to staff open positions and often higher interest rates as the Fed seeks to head off inflation and asset bubbles. All of these problems are, to some extent, present in the current environment. However, in addition, the economy in 2018 has been boosted by substantial fiscal stimulus. As that effect fades in 2019 and 2020, the economy should grow more slowly, and slow growth combined with some exogenous shock could trigger a recession, with the risk rising in late 2019 and 2020. Such a recession could also be expected to result in a sharp stock market decline.
Sizing up the next bear market
While there is a good chance that the U.S. economy could see both a recession and an equity bear market in the next few years, it is important to have a realistic perspective on the magnitude of both. This may be difficult for some investors since the last recession was the single biggest recession in the post-WWII era and the last two bear markets in U.S. stocks each saw declines of roughly 50% (Exhibit 2).
On the issue of recession, it needs to be recognized that, despite the Great Financial Crisis, the economy has actually been getting more stable over time. This can be seen in the diminished quarter-to-quarter volatility in real GDP, and our research suggests that better inventory management, a more stable housing sector and the growth of the more stable services sectors have all contributed to this trend. However, this also suggests that the next recession is more likely to resemble the relatively mild recessions of 1990 and 2001 than the monster recession of 2007-2009.
In similar fashion, the next bear market should not be as fierce as the last two. In the last two bear markets, the U.S. stock market fell by an average of 50%. However, in the previous nine recessions, the average stock market decline was just 24%. This makes intuitive sense – the last stock market tumble occurred against a backdrop of the single biggest recession since the Great Depression, while the stock market entered the previous bear market with valuations that were a full 50% higher than the average forward P/E over the last 25 years (Exhibit 3).
If the next bear market is indeed serious but not catastrophic, then investors need a prudent way to be prepared to weather it rather than adopting an “Armageddon” strategy.
Being prepared for the next bear market
As investors consider how to be prepared for the next U.S. equity bear market, it is important to recognize that this involves melding together two separate strategies: (1) how to get the best, risk-adjusted returns before the onset of a bear market and (2) how to be as prepared as possible when the bear market actually occurs.
On the second strategy, the traditional advice in entering a bear market is to have a heavy allocation to Treasury bonds. Some fear that this time around, given very low interest rates already, Treasuries have less potential to act as an offset to equity market losses. However, as can be seen in Exhibit 4, recent history does not support this fear.
We looked at uses of monthly data from the last 25 years and restricted our analysis to those months in which the S&P 500 provided a negative total return. Then grouping those months into quintiles by the prevailing level of interest rates at the time, we ask the question: how much could portfolio losses be reduced by moving from a stocks-only portfolio to a 50/50 equity/Treasury portfolio. The answer is, total portfolio losses could be reduced by between 51% and 66% across the quintiles, but the offset appears to be independent of the prevailing level of interest rates. The reason for this is clear enough – even though the coupon payments on bonds are lower at lower interest rates, the duration of bond portfolios is longer, allowing for greater capital gains when interest rates fall. The upshot of this is that Treasuries are still positioned to provide some protection in a bear market for stocks.
A second worry for those preparing for a bear market in U.S. stocks is that diversifying internationally cannot work since, metaphorically, when the U.S. sneezes, the rest of the world catches a cold. In other words, in a bear market for U.S. stocks, international stocks do even worse.
Data from the last 25 years only partly support this contention. Again, looking at only those months in which the S&P 500 provided a negative total return, the MSCI AC World ex. USA generally fell by the same amount as the U.S. whether the U.S. drop was small or large (Exhibit 5). Thus, the reality is that when the U.S. catches a cold, the rest of the world catches a cold as well.
In short, there is little evidence to suggest that bonds will provide less protection or that international stocks will provide more protection in the next bear market than in its predecessors. However, there still may be good reason for a fixed income underweight and an international overweight today. Entering into the fourth quarter of 2018, international stocks still appear undervalued relative to their domestic counterparts, and both EM and Europe should have more room to grow from an economic perspective. Meanwhile, as the Federal Reserve continues to tighten policy, long-term interest rates are likely to rise, hurting long-term returns.
However, in an old economic expansion and old bull market, investors should maintain flexibility in allocations. It would not take much of a further increase in interest rates or stock prices to justify a neutral allocation between stocks and bonds, and the international equity environment is also rapidly evolving.
I was in a meeting recently discussing asset allocation when a much-esteemed British colleague suggested that a certain strategy was like “fixing the roof while the sun shines”. Growing up in agricultural Ireland, I had always heard something slightly different, namely that you should “make hay while the sun shines.” So which is it? Given a still relatively sunny financial environment, should investors be actively preparing for the next storm or busily accumulating winnings while they have the chance? The answer, of course, is a bit of both.
Seek a smoother ride in international equity markets with JPIN
How to Work With a Narcissist
Roll Over 401(K) to IRA, but Keep Your Job
The Waterfall Effect or the Delicate Art of Alignment
Muni Technicals Weaken, but Relative Performance Holds Steady
What Customer Reaction to GDPR Is Telling Us About Our Data Culture
How to Get Rid of Your Toxic Work Culture
11 Ways the New Tax Law Could Help or Hurt Your Tax Return
4 Powerful Personal Branding Examples that Work
How Being Short Enables Investors to Be More Long
Storyselling: Six Magic Words Guaranteed to Engage Your Clients
Investing in Life8 hours ago
Storyselling: Six Magic Words Guaranteed to Engage Your Clients
Development9 hours ago
How to Offer More to Your Ideal Clients
Solutions9 hours ago
Top 4 Themes in Impact Investing Right Now
Investments1 day ago
Global Equity Views 4Q 2018
Development1 day ago
How To Deliver Value During Prospect Engagement
Financial Podcasts1 day ago
How to Merge a CPA Firm With a Wealth Management Firm
Learn2 days ago
Millennials and Responsible Investing: Bridging the Generation Gap
Social Selling2 days ago
Is Spending Piles of Money on Marketing Just a Waste?