Written by: Dan Wheeler | Wheeler Writes
When commissions were banned in both the U.K. and Australia, I applauded their Regulators, who took a stand for investors against the Financial Industries in their respective countries. It was a long time coming but it is now a reality.
Having witnessed these developments I began to speculate whether or not such a ban could ever be implemented in the U.S. Being aware of the strong financial ties between Wall Street and politicians of both parties, I have been skeptical that such reforms could ever become law in the U.S.
However the debate has begun. The arguments against banning commissions are twofold:
Excuse me? That should be one of the main objectives of any legislation. Small investors are exploited more than others because they are sold the products with the highest commissions. Otherwise it is not worth the sales person’s time. Once people realize they are being ripped off, they will be motivated to invest some time learning how to invest their savings. I used to say, if people would spend as much time making investment decisions as they do when making decisions about which car to buy, they would have a much better investment experience.
This brings back memories of when I would write about “conflicted advice” in Investment Advisor Magazine. I would get emails (maybe it was “hate mail”) accusing me of destroying the sender’s career. My response would be, “if your career is based on ripping people off, perhaps a new career may be needed.”
Both of these arguments are what I would expect. They put the Financial Services Industry’s interest ahead of the investors’ interest. Wall Street is not going to roll over without a fight. There is too much money at stake. Rather than simply ban commissions, they will likely settle for a slight tightening of the rules regarding their fiduciary responsibility that requires them to put the investors interest first and no doubt the training syllabus for new brokers will include a course on “how to comply with the law while still maximizing commission income.” If that is all the reform does, enforcing such a rule will be cumbersome and expensive.
Simply banning commission would be a much more effective way to protect investors and be a lot less expensive to all parties involved.