Companies are notorious when it comes to feedback. There are countless systems developed, executed and utilized at all levels of an organization. We want to know what people think !! Or do we ??
Seriously, one of the areas that HR is thrust into on at least an annual basis is some sort of programmed, structured feedback. You’ve all seen it. It can come in all kinds of packages – Performance reviews, 360s, Employee Engagement surveys, one-on-ones, etc. So much feedback is gathered that it’s actually very daunting !! This is true because VERY little of the feedback taken in from employees is consistently acted upon. This isn’t being cynical. This is being realistic.
We should have a day when we take all of the past strategy meetings, brainstorming sessions and annual reviews out from the past five years. Then we should list out all of the feedback and data that was given across the organization and within departments to see what percentage ever came to life. It would be minuscule I promise you !!
Why is this? I think there are some compelling reasons that need to be called out and then changed.
If you are gathering feedback in order to use reviews to “build your case” on an employee – stop it !! If you need feedback on a few people, but you press the whole organization to participate – stop it !! It’s time to take the mystery out of feedback.
What do you actually mean by “feedback” ?? Are there parameters that people can follow? What is the context as to why you’re gathering feedback and how is it going to be used? How is the feedback going to be given to the person that we’re reviewing?
Feedback can be a powerful tool IF (and that’s a gigantic if !!) it’s used for coaching and development. If feedback is only gathered as a defense, or as a way to justify what you want to do with an employee, then you’re doing it wrong. I know that’s a strong position to take but it’s legit.
Most feedback in organizations is negative. We spend countless hours on fixing people’s weaknesses and gaps. We even base entire compensation and bonus structures on what people don’t do.
Isn’t this backwards ??
What if you tried to measure people’s strengths? What if you took time to give feedback on a regular basis at the time where it will be fresh, remembered and most poignant?
It’s time for HR to rip open the mystery box and not allow systems that continue to measure what’s not being done. Your employees rock and want to do their best. It’s an opportunity to blaze a new trail and differentiate both your organization and your great team members. Build a feedback system with clear parameters that allow people to flourish instead of wondering when the next shoe will fall.
Trust me. If you choose to do this (and I’m trying like crazy in my organization), then you will set a new standard of tangible development. Feedback will be regularly and willingly given by employees. It’s refreshing and you should try it !!
Advisors: The Power of Technology Only Works Through Teamwork
Munis Keep Rolling Along
The Periodic Table of Investment Returns Can Cure Investment FOMO
Sales is All About Psychology
The Truth: Introverts and Extraverts Are Wired Differently
Everything You Need to Know About Solar Panels
6 Tips to Better Work With Your IT Department
Just Another Manic Monday
The Four-Year College Degree on a Budget
Equities11 hours ago
Development11 hours ago
How to Get Your Network Working For You
Development11 hours ago
7 Things Advisors Need to Know About Succession Planning
Let's Solve It1 day ago
Do the Recent Trade Tensions Matter for the U.S. Economy?
Research1 day ago
What Every Investor Can Learn From Buffett’s $4.3 Billion Mistake
Insights1 day ago
China’s Looming Current Account Deficit Will Have Consequences for Us All
Research2 days ago
Trump’s Trade War Is Good for These 3 Dividend Stocks
Development2 days ago
The Truth About Getting to the Next Level as an Advisor