This year’s Oscar awards ceremony was notable in a couple of ways. For one, the ceremony didn’t have a host this year. After some controversy over alleged homophobic remarks the Oscars scrapped planned host Kevin Hart. After an unsuccessful search for a replacement, they ultimately opted to go host-less, which observers felt went off very well.
Toward a More Diverse Field of Nominees
The second change has been longer in the making. In 2016 outrage emerged over the perceived lack of diversity in the Oscars, as highlighted by the prominence of the #OscarsSoWhite movement. As this chart from Time demonstrates, the Oscars have been historically dominated by white nominees for the major individual categories: best actor, best actress, best supporting actor, and best supporting actress through 2015, just before the movement took off.
In response, in 2016 the Academy vowed to increase representation by women and minorities, which was intended to increase the number of nominees from historically under-represented groups. In 2017, observers acknowledged progress, albeit slow progress, toward greater diversity. In 2018, commentators once again bemoaned slow progress toward diversity as the awards ceremony also received its lowest ratings ever.
A D&I Turning Point?
This year, however, the diversity initiative seems to have hit a potential inflection point. USA Today’s Oscar headline read: “‘Finally the door is wide open’: Oscars’ big winner is diversity as winners make history.” Slate proclaimed, “When it Comes to Diversity, These Were the Perfect Oscars for 2019.” And whether it was the host-less format, the increase in diversity or simply interest in the individual performers and films, the Oscars saw their highest ratings in five years.
Inclusion is a Business Imperative!
This story of the Oscars over the last several years illustrates a couple of points we’ve often made about diversity and inclusion. First, inclusion, not just diversity, is key. It may have taken a couple of years to bear real fruit, but the Academy’s decision to diversify the body that actually selects nominees and votes on winners—i.e., inclusion—has resulted in a more diverse ceremony. Second, diversity and inclusion are good for business. Again, it’s hard to say for sure what drove the boost in ratings this year, and it may be due to a combination of factors, but the broader demographic appeal of a more diverse applicant pool almost certainly contributed to this year’s higher ratings.
OUR NEW BOOK HAS BEEN RELEASED!
In Inclusion: STILL the Competitive Business Advantage, we continue our contributions to thought leadership on the importance of inclusion in an environment that has been roiled with new discussion—and new dissent—amid rapidly changing demographics, continually emerging technology and a global economy that is continually shifting to favor newly emerging market powerhouses. We’re very gratified by the positive reviews already pouring in.
Not All Consumers Make Good Advice Clients
The 5 Phases of FinTech: 2005-2027
Retirement For Clients With Modest Portfolios
Client Divorce Advice: What About the House?
The Power of Socially Responsible Investing
Consider Upcycling Your Knowledge
How to Explore Your Relationship With Money
6 Key Ways of Organizing Your Business for Growth
Spring Ahead in Marketing While You Still Have Time
Are You Preparing for the Future?
Let's Solve It24 hours ago
Do the Recent Trade Tensions Matter for the U.S. Economy?
Research24 hours ago
What Every Investor Can Learn From Buffett’s $4.3 Billion Mistake
Insights24 hours ago
China’s Looming Current Account Deficit Will Have Consequences for Us All
Research2 days ago
Trump’s Trade War Is Good for These 3 Dividend Stocks
Development2 days ago
The Truth About Getting to the Next Level as an Advisor
Building Smarter Portfolios2 days ago
Building the Case for Small Caps
Research3 days ago
Where Will We Get the Money to Pay for This Spending?
Human Performance4 days ago
You Are Your Ideal Client