Facebook has been in the news quite a bit lately over alleged wrongdoing in the social media giant’s business practices.
There have been allegations surrounding the 2016 US Presidential Election that Facebook didn’t do enough to detect and stop meddling from foreign factions, and there have been numerous allegations of intentional or at least negligent violations of basic privacy protections when it comes to user data.
In a recent article for the Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM), Allen Smith, J.D. reports that the company is again in the spotlight.
Smith reports on a December 2017 class action suit that alleges that employers are blocking older Facebook users from seeing their ads, in essence targeting a younger demographic instead. He quotes attorney Peter Romer-Friedman with Outten & Golden in Washington, D.C., and a lead attorney in the case: “Facebook has been complicit in the age discrimination. Hundreds of employers ‘consciously decided to exclude’ older workers by formatting their job ads so that only younger Facebook users will see them,” Romer-Friedman said.
Smith reports that Facebook vice-president of ads issued a statement pushing back on the allegations of the company’s complicity in age bias and arguing that a decision to show job ads to different age groups is not in itself discriminatory, likening the practice to advertising in general which is often targeted to various demographic groups. According to Facebook’s statement: “What matters is that marketing is broadly based and inclusive, not simply focused on a particular age group. In addition, certain employers want to attract retirees, or recruit for jobs with specific age restrictions like the military or airline pilots.”
Still, it’s not a stretch to surmise that there are employers that may be purposefully eliminating an older demographic from their consideration set. That exclusion, as with any type of exclusion, can be a bad business practice.
Inclusion and diversity efforts go far beyond simply employing people from diverse racial and ethnic backgrounds. It also means diversity and inclusion among people of different gender, sexual orientation, religious and age groups. There are both legal and PR aspects of this. It’s arguable, as the Facebook case demonstrates, that it’s not necessarily illegal to target job ads to certain age groups. But companies will have to consider how age generally fits into their overall diversity and inclusion goals.
Inclusion is a business imperative! Be inclusive!
Signs of Slowing Economy Continue to Mount
11 Most Read IRIS Articles of the Week!
3 Strategies to Feel More in Control of Your Investments in 2019
3 Life Insights From the Jeff and Mackenzie Bezos Divorce
Weekend Warriors: Ortho Regenerative Technologies Begins Final Animal Studies in Rotator Cuff Repair
Advisors: A New Way to Build Trust With Your Audience on Social Media
4 Tips to Get Over Your Fears of Being on Camera
Top 7 Questions To Identify Core Leadership Skills
How Technology Is Helping Clients Take a Bigger Role Than Ever
What Happens When Labour Gets Commoditized
Markets1 day ago
Long-Term Investors: The S&P 500 Is Not Your Friend. Here’s Why.
Development1 day ago
Again, and Again, and Again: The Way to Build a Great Advisory
Advisor Marketing1 day ago
How to Integrate a Robo-Advisor Offering on Your Website
Equities2 days ago
MIT Says 2019 the Year That Blockchain Goes Mainstream
Sales Strategy2 days ago
The “Polite” Prospect Can Be the Most Difficult Prospect
Human Performance2 days ago
6 Techniques to Close Deals Faster
Markets3 days ago
Is the Market Rising Due to the Lack of Bad News Screaming at Us?
Markets3 days ago
The Early Bird Sells too Soon